Author(s): Hengbin Wang and Chenbei Chang
Lab/Group: The Wang Lab (UAB)
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.432

Investigating histone deubiquitination: Xenopus manipulations

Hengbin Wang, hbwang@uab.edu, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Chenbei Chang, cchang@uab.edu, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Lab/Group: The Wang Lab (UAB)

Journal: Nature

Article Title: Regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression by H2A deubiquitination

Introduction

Posttranslational histone modifications play important roles in regulating chromatin structure and function. One example of such modifications is histone ubiquitination, which occurs predominately on H2A and H2B. Although the recent identification of the ubiquitin ligase for histone H2A has revealed important roles for H2A ubiquitination in Hox gene silencing as well as in X inactivation, the enzyme(s) involved in H2A deubiquitination and the function of H2A deubiquitination are not known. Here we report the identification and functional characterization of the major deubiquitinase for histone H2A, Ubp-M. Ubp-M prefers nucleosomal substrates in vitro, and specifically deubiquitinates histone H2A but not H2B in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, knockdowns of Ubp-M result in slow cell growth rates, which are due to defects in the mitotic phase of the cell cycle. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Ubp-M regulates Hox gene expression through H2A deubiquitination and that blocking the function of Ubp-M results in defective posterior development in Xenopus laevis. Therefore, this study identifies the major deubiquitinase for histone H2A and demonstrates that H2A deubiquitination plays a critical role in cell cycle progression and gene expression.

Materials

Reagents

Xenopus
RNA probes
Ubp-M antigen and antibody

Equipment

Time Taken

Procedure

1. Inject 300-600 pg IgG or anti-Ubp-M antibody into both blastomeres of two-cell stage embryos.
2. Collect the embryos at tailbud stages for in situ hybridization with HoxD10, Sox2, Otx2, En2 and Krox20 antisense RNA probes, or at tadpole stages for morphological assessment of the effects.
3. For specificity control, mix an equal amount of Ubp-M antigen peptide with the antibody on ice for at least 30 min before coinjection into the embryos.
4. Perform whole-mount in situ hybridization as described (Harland, 1991).

Troubleshooting

Critical Steps

Anticipated Results

References

Harland, R. In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 36, 685-695 (1991).

Acknowledgements

Keywords

Xenopus

Post a comment


Extra navigation

Search Protocols

Feedback

0 comments have been posted on this protocol

ADVERTISEMENT